Stockfish chess elo rating11/13/2022 ![]() Stockfish had threads=64 set, but the actual hardware had only 8 CPU cores, that effectively slowed things down quite a lot.Time control was 1 minute/move, which throws out of the window various optimizations re: using more time thinking about difficult moves.The Stockfish version that played agaist AlphaZero was significantly compromised in several different aspects: The Stockfish Elo rating provided in the paper is the full version, thus this replication is needed.Note that Stockfish had good 64 threads CPU and could evaluate 70 million positions/second.So, did anyone test it? Is anyone interested in testing it? Maybe Stockfish developers, because Stockfish's pride is at stake? Or is there other way to approach the problem? Thus we could infer the Elo rating of AlphaZero and answer most questions. STOCKFISH CHESS ELO RATING FULL VERSIONOne work around is to replicate the Stockfish version that played AlphaZero, to see how strong it is compared to the full version and other engine and human. However, this leaves chess lovers with many questions like what is the true strength of AlphaZero? What is the true advantage of strategic/positional sacrifice play? Were Morphy, Tal, and others correct and Stockfish wrong? Or full version Stockfish is still the best? counting/tactical play by brute force search. It is to test intuitive/strategic play by deep learning technique vs. This setting by DeepMind is understandable from a scientific perspective though. But some people were disputing its win, because Stockfish was running on weak hardware (1 GB RAM), not access to opening book, not having free time control, maybe not have endgame table base, etc. AlphaZero has defeated Stockfish with all novelties and brilliant strategic sacrifices. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply.AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |